BNCL Law Firm - Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy

Voting Rights on the Ropes: How the New Admin is Strangling Fair Elections

August 7, 2025

For decades, voting rights have been the fragile backbone of American democracy. Every expansion of the ballot—from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Voting Rights Act of 1965—came with blood, sweat, and resistance. And now, the new administration has made dismantling these protections a cornerstone of its agenda. What does that mean for everyday citizens? Simply put, your right to vote is under assault.

A Coordinated Attack

The Department of Justice has gutted its Civil Rights Division, with mass staff departures leaving voting-rights cases abandoned. Consent decrees on discriminatory practices are being dropped like bad investments. States hostile to voting access see this as a green light. They’re pushing stricter voter ID laws, slashing early voting days, and redrawing district lines to choke minority representation.

This isn’t just policy—it’s a systematic attempt to shrink the electorate. The less you vote, the stronger entrenched power becomes.

Why It Matters

Voting rights are not an abstract legal idea. They decide whether your community gets resources, whether your children’s schools are funded, and whether your city’s police are held accountable. When access to the ballot is weakened, power tilts toward those already in charge.

For Californians, this matters too. The state’s relatively open voting system stands in stark contrast to restrictive regimes like Texas or Georgia. But make no mistake—national rollbacks eventually hit everyone. When the federal government retreats from enforcing the Voting Rights Act, it signals to bad actors nationwide that voter suppression will be tolerated.

The Role of Civil Rights Lawyers

With the DOJ asleep at the wheel, the burden falls on private civil-rights firms like BNCL to fight these battles in court. Challenging discriminatory district maps, exposing targeted disenfranchisement, and standing up for voters of color is no longer just a federal job—it’s our collective responsibility.

BNCL has a long history of taking on cases that others deemed too big, too complex, or too politically risky. That same approach will be needed in this new era, where litigation and activism may be the only guardrails left protecting democracy.

What You Can Do

  • Stay informed about your state’s voting laws. They are changing quickly, and confusion is often part of the suppression playbook.
  • Support organizations that litigate voter-suppression cases.
  • Recognize that voting rights are civil rights. The erosion of one weakens the foundation of all others.

The right to vote is the right that preserves all others. If it withers, so does democracy.

Case Results

Reginald Oliver v. City of Oakland

Oakland Police keep fabricating evidence and lying about minorities to arrest and prosecute them for supposed “gang” crimes, in violation of a settlement that prohibits …

Read More
Named plaintiff Reginald Oliver claims the Oakland PD continues violating the Constitution, in defiance of the settlement in Delphine Allen e al. v. City of Oakland, USDC No. C-00-4599 TEH, also known as "The Riders" litigation. Read Full Course
John Burris
Jane Smith v. City of Oakland

Racial profiling of Asian women by police officer resulting in a class action complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief

Read More
Finding evidence about defendant's post-conviction parole violation unfairly prejudicial "since the jury could have construed that parole violation as character evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)" Read Full Course
Rodney King
Rodney King v. City of Los Angeles

Rodney King has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have Judge John G. Davies disqualified from presiding at the trial of …

Read More
Rodney King waited too long to file a malpractice suit against the first of 27 lawyers who represented him in connection with the infamous beating he suffered from Los Angeles police in 1991, this district’s Court of Appeal ruled yesterday. The ruling by Div. Two affirmed Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann Kough’s grant of summary judgment to Steven Lerman. King earlier this year dismissed his appeal of Kough’s ruling in favor of two other lawyers sued in the case, Federico Sayre and John Burris. Read Full Course
FEATURED News & Updates

Civil rights lawyer John Burris confronts police narratives

Written by Janie Har, AP researcher Rhonda Shafner also contributed to this report. To read on AP News click here OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Before …

Watch our video
Share via
Copy link