Federal Appeals Lawyer in California | BNCL Law Firm

Federal Appeals Lawyer in California

Losing a case in federal court can have an extremely negative impact on the rest of your life. You may be facing long sentences in federal prison, high fines, and even damage to your reputation. Fortunately, the final decision made in federal criminal cases can be overturned in some cases. To overturn a decision made in federal court, you must show certain aspects of your case and comply with many procedural rules. At Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy, our California federal appeals lawyers can advise you of the process and give you the best chance of success with your case.

Alt Text!

Not every unfavorable outcome means the case can be appealed. To have the right to appeal, you must show that the U.S. District Court that heard your trial made an error with court proceedings, the law that was applied, or how the law was applied. For example, if the trial judge did not apply the law to your case correctly, that can be grounds for a federal appeal.

It is important to know that a federal appeal is not a new trial. The appellate courts will only consider the arguments presented during the trial, and new evidence is not accepted. You must only be able to show that there was a legal mistake during the trial and that correcting it could directly impact the outcome of your case.

The federal courts hear many different types of cases and a mistake can be made in any of them. However, there are some types of cases that form the basis of federal appeals more commonly than others. These are as follows:

  • White collar crimes such as bribery, bank fraud, credit card fraud, insider trading, identify theft, and money laundering
  • Wire fraud and mail fraud
  • Drug offenses including trafficking, manufacturing, and conspiracy
  • Weapon and firearm offenses
  • Health care fraud

Just as a legal error can be made in any federal case, there are also many different types of mistakes that are made. The legal issues in a federal appeal can include an evidentiary issue, a procedural issue, or a constitutional issue. Some of the most common legal issues in federal appeals are as follows:

  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • Miranda rights
  • Due process rights
  • Arrest warrants
  • Searches of homes and businesses
  • Evidentiary rules
  • Excessive sentencing, including cruel and unusual punishment
  • Right to effective assistance of counsel

You may have the right to appeal the decision made in your federal case, but you only have a very limited time to do so. At Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy, our California federal appeals lawyers will make sure your appeal is filed in a timely manner and present arguments to give you the best chance of getting the trial court’s decision overturned. Call us now at 510-839-5200 or reach out to us online to schedule a consultation and to learn more about how we can help.

How can we help?
Subject*

Our Offices

Northern California Office Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Ph: (510) 839-5200
Southern California Office
9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Ph: (310) 601-7070
For press inquiries,
please contact:
Lee Houskeeper
newsservice@aol.com
Ph: (415) 654-9141

Our Offices

Northern California Office Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Ph: (510) 839-5200
Southern California Office
9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Ph: (310) 601-7070
For press inquiries,
please contact:
Lee Houskeeper
newsservice@aol.com
Ph: (415) 654-9141
Case Results

Reginald Oliver v. City of Oakland

Oakland Police keep fabricating evidence and lying about minorities to arrest and prosecute them for supposed “gang” crimes, in violation of a settlement that prohibits …

Read More
Named plaintiff Reginald Oliver claims the Oakland PD continues violating the Constitution, in defiance of the settlement in Delphine Allen e al. v. City of Oakland, USDC No. C-00-4599 TEH, also known as "The Riders" litigation. Read Full Course
John Burris
Jane Smith v. City of Oakland

Racial profiling of Asian women by police officer resulting in a class action complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief

Read More
Finding evidence about defendant's post-conviction parole violation unfairly prejudicial "since the jury could have construed that parole violation as character evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)" Read Full Course
Rodney King
Rodney King v. City of Los Angeles

Rodney King has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have Judge John G. Davies disqualified from presiding at the trial of …

Read More
Rodney King waited too long to file a malpractice suit against the first of 27 lawyers who represented him in connection with the infamous beating he suffered from Los Angeles police in 1991, this district’s Court of Appeal ruled yesterday. The ruling by Div. Two affirmed Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann Kough’s grant of summary judgment to Steven Lerman. King earlier this year dismissed his appeal of Kough’s ruling in favor of two other lawyers sued in the case, Federico Sayre and John Burris. Read Full Course
FEATURED News & Updates

Civil rights lawyer John Burris confronts police narratives

Written by Janie Har, AP researcher Rhonda Shafner also contributed to this report. To read on AP News click here OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Before …

Watch our video