Rising Hate Crimes During U.S. Elections:

The Escalating Threat of Hate Crimes Ahead of the 2024 Election

August 13, 2024

Image of Protest with caption #stophate

As the United States approaches the 2024 election cycle, a troubling pattern has emerged: hate crimes tend to spike during presidential election years. This pattern has become increasingly pronounced over the last four election cycles, with reported hate crimes reaching record highs during these politically charged periods. The 2021 FBI hate crime statistics revealed the highest number of reported incidents since data collection began in 1991. However, these figures only scratch the surface, as underreporting by law enforcement agencies remains a significant issue.

The Rise of Hate Crimes in Recent Years

The surge in hate crimes is not a new phenomenon. Since 2015, reported incidents have nearly doubled, with white supremacist violence playing a significant role. The political climate has become increasingly polarized, with white nationalist ideologies moving into the mainstream, fueled by disinformation and conspiracy theories. This toxic environment has been amplified by the failure of social media platforms to effectively curb the spread of hate speech and misinformation, allowing these dangerous ideas to flourish unchecked.

The Impact on Marginalized Communities

Various communities have borne the brunt of this rise in hate crimes. Anti-Asian hate crimes saw a 168% increase from 2020 to 2021, driven by pandemic-related scapegoating. Anti-Black hate crimes also spiked, particularly during the racial justice protests of 2020. The LGBTQ+ community, too, has faced increased violence, with reported hate crimes based on sexual orientation and gender identity rising sharply in recent years. These incidents reflect not only individual acts of hate but also a broader societal trend towards intolerance and exclusion.

The Role of Social Media and Public Discourse

Social media platforms have played a crucial role in this escalation. Despite having policies to prevent the spread of hate and disinformation, platforms like Twitter and Facebook have been inconsistent in enforcing these rules. This failure has allowed hate groups and individuals to use these platforms to organize, recruit, and spread their messages to a wider audience. The consequences are dire, as seen in tragic events like the Charlottesville rally and the mass shooting at the Pulse nightclub.

Recommendations for Addressing the Crisis

To combat the rising tide of hate crimes, several steps must be taken:

  1. Social Media Accountability: Platforms must invest in robust content moderation, particularly in the lead-up to elections. They should also close loopholes that allow hate speech and disinformation to thrive.
  2. Government Action: The federal government needs to address white supremacist violence through civil rights frameworks rather than further criminalizing marginalized communities. Congress should also mandate comprehensive hate crime data collection and reporting.
  3. Public Officials’ Responsibility: Elected officials must denounce hate unequivocally. Their leadership can send a powerful message that hate is not tolerated, which can help reduce the prevalence of these crimes.

Looking Ahead

The rise in hate crimes poses a significant threat not only to the safety of marginalized communities but also to the fabric of American democracy. As we approach the 2024 election, it is imperative that both public and private sectors take concrete steps to address this growing crisis. Only through collective action can we hope to curb the spread of hate and build a more just and inclusive society.

This blog post draws from the findings of The Leadership Conference Education Fund’s report “Cause for Concern 2024: The State of Hate.” The report highlights the critical need for action as the country faces another potentially divisive election year. By understanding the factors driving this rise in hate crimes and implementing the recommended measures, we can work towards a safer and more equitable future.

Case Results

Reginald Oliver v. City of Oakland

Oakland Police keep fabricating evidence and lying about minorities to arrest and prosecute them for supposed “gang” crimes, in violation of a settlement that prohibits …

Read More
Named plaintiff Reginald Oliver claims the Oakland PD continues violating the Constitution, in defiance of the settlement in Delphine Allen e al. v. City of Oakland, USDC No. C-00-4599 TEH, also known as "The Riders" litigation. Read Full Course
John Burris
Jane Smith v. City of Oakland

Racial profiling of Asian women by police officer resulting in a class action complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief

Read More
Finding evidence about defendant's post-conviction parole violation unfairly prejudicial "since the jury could have construed that parole violation as character evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)" Read Full Course
Rodney King
Rodney King v. City of Los Angeles

Rodney King has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have Judge John G. Davies disqualified from presiding at the trial of …

Read More
Rodney King waited too long to file a malpractice suit against the first of 27 lawyers who represented him in connection with the infamous beating he suffered from Los Angeles police in 1991, this district’s Court of Appeal ruled yesterday. The ruling by Div. Two affirmed Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann Kough’s grant of summary judgment to Steven Lerman. King earlier this year dismissed his appeal of Kough’s ruling in favor of two other lawyers sued in the case, Federico Sayre and John Burris. Read Full Course
FEATURED News & Updates

Civil rights lawyer John Burris confronts police narratives

Written by Janie Har, AP researcher Rhonda Shafner also contributed to this report. To read on AP News click here OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Before …

Watch our video
Share via
Copy link