Attorneys for Police Shootings | BNCL Law Firm

Attorneys for Police Shootings

Over the past few years, police shootings have started to make headlines more and more. The tragic news is that they have been occurring for decades, and too many lives have been lost. Whether you have lost a loved one during a police shooting or you have suffered a physical or mental injury as a victim of a police shooting, it is important to know your rights may have been violated. If that is the case, you can pursue legal action to recover financial compensation for your injuries. Our California police shooting lawyers at Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy, can help you prove your case.

Alt Text!

When a police officer uses their firearm, it is considered deadly force due to the fact that serious injury or fatality can reasonably occur. Generally speaking, police officers can only use deadly force in two circumstances. The first is when they have probable cause to believe that a person poses an immediate threat of severe bodily harm to the officer or others. The other instance is when law enforcement believes a dangerous suspect has committed a crime that involved the infliction of serious physical injury and the suspect was trying to flee.

Police shootings should rarely occur but unfortunately, they are far too common. Some of the common scenarios that result in police shootings are as follows:
  • Routine traffic stops that escalate into a far more serious situation
  • Detentions and arrests that become heated
  • In conclusion of pursuing a person
  • Racial profiling
  • During acts of violence or riots in prisons, jail, and detention centers
Police officers receive formal training to handle situations that involve violence and when tensions are high. Law enforcement officers should always try to deescalate a situation before they use any type of force. When force is necessary, such as if a police officer has to restrain someone, police officers are allowed to use a reasonable amount of force. After the situation has been calmed, or there is no reason to use force, it is considered excessive force if the police officer continues engaging in physical contact.
Due to the fact that police officers are allowed to use a certain degree of force, it is not always easy to determine when that force is considered excessive. Generally speaking, a California police shooting lawyer will consider whether another police officer would have acted in the same manner in a similar situation. Reviewing important evidence such as video footage or eyewitness statements of the incident can also help an attorney determine whether excessive force was used.
Whether you have been a victim yourself or you have lost a loved one, our California police shooting lawyers at Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy can help you make things right. Our skilled attorneys know many police shootings fall into the category of excessive force and can help you claim compensation for any losses you incurred as a result. Call us today or fill out our online form to schedule a meeting with one of our experienced attorneys.
How can we help?

    Subject*

    Please describe your issue

    Our Offices

    Northern California Office Airport Corporate Centre
    7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
    Oakland, CA 94621
    Ph: (510) 839-5200
    Southern California Office
    9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000
    Beverly Hills, CA 90212
    Ph: (310) 601-7070
    For press inquiries,
    please contact:
    Lee Houskeeper
    newsservice@aol.com
    Ph: (415)654-9141

    Our Offices

    Northern California Office Airport Corporate Centre
    7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
    Oakland, CA 94621
    Ph: (510) 839-5200
    Southern California Office
    9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000
    Beverly Hills, CA 90212
    Ph: (310) 601-7070
    For press inquiries,
    please contact:
    Lee Houskeeper
    newsservice@aol.com
    Ph: (415)654-9141
    Case Results

    Reginald Oliver v. City of Oakland

    Oakland Police keep fabricating evidence and lying about minorities to arrest and prosecute them for supposed “gang” crimes, in violation of a settlement that prohibits …

    Read More
    Named plaintiff Reginald Oliver claims the Oakland PD continues violating the Constitution, in defiance of the settlement in Delphine Allen e al. v. City of Oakland, USDC No. C-00-4599 TEH, also known as "The Riders" litigation. Read Full Course
    John Burris
    Jane Smith v. City of Oakland

    Racial profiling of Asian women by police officer resulting in a class action complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief

    Read More
    Finding evidence about defendant's post-conviction parole violation unfairly prejudicial "since the jury could have construed that parole violation as character evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)" Read Full Course
    Rodney King
    Rodney King v. City of Los Angeles

    Rodney King has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have Judge John G. Davies disqualified from presiding at the trial of …

    Read More
    Rodney King waited too long to file a malpractice suit against the first of 27 lawyers who represented him in connection with the infamous beating he suffered from Los Angeles police in 1991, this district’s Court of Appeal ruled yesterday. The ruling by Div. Two affirmed Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann Kough’s grant of summary judgment to Steven Lerman. King earlier this year dismissed his appeal of Kough’s ruling in favor of two other lawyers sued in the case, Federico Sayre and John Burris. Read Full Course
    FEATURED News & Updates

    Civil rights lawyer John Burris confronts police narratives

    Written by Janie Har, AP researcher Rhonda Shafner also contributed to this report. To read on AP News click here OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Before …

    Watch our video