BNCL Law Firm - Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy

Justice Denied: Federal Oversight of Louisville and Minneapolis Police Departments Quietly Dropped

May 22, 2025

In a deeply troubling turn, the U.S. Department of Justice has quietly dismissed its federal oversight agreements with the Louisville Metro Police Department and the Minneapolis Police Department — the very departments at the center of two of the most high-profile police brutality cases in modern history.

No press conference. No formal announcement. Just a short, late-night DOJ filing stating that “ongoing consent decrees no longer serve the interest of justice.” With the stroke of a pen, years of work, community engagement, and federal accountability were tossed out.

At BNCL, we’ve been here before. We’ve seen how oversight disappears when the headlines fade. But this one cuts deep because it’s a betrayal — not just of the families of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, but of every community that believed federal oversight could be a tool for lasting change.

What Are Consent Decrees?

Consent decrees are legally binding agreements between the federal government and local law enforcement agencies, usually imposed after the DOJ finds a pattern of constitutional violations. They mandate reforms like:

  • Use of force restrictions
  • De-escalation training
  • Body camera requirements
  • Improved systems for civilian complaints

These decrees are not symbolic. They’re structural. And in both Minneapolis and Louisville, they were critical responses to confirmed findings of racist, violent, and unconstitutional policing.

The Cases That Brought Them

  • Louisville: In 2020, Breonna Taylor was shot and killed by police executing a no-knock warrant. The investigation uncovered a widespread pattern of excessive force, racial profiling, and retaliatory policing.
  • Minneapolis: George Floyd’s murder in 2020 by Officer Derek Chauvin shocked the world. The DOJ’s subsequent investigation revealed systemic abuse, including officers using deadly force disproportionately against Black residents.

The consent decrees were imperfect, but they were progress. Dropping them signals that the federal government has decided these departments have “done enough.”

Spoiler: they haven’t.

What This Means for Civil Rights

Ending federal oversight means two of the most problematic police departments in the country are now policing themselves. There is no independent monitor. No reporting requirements. No accountability if they regress — or never change, to begin with.

It also sets a dangerous precedent. If even the highest-profile departments can shake off oversight in a few years, what does that say to smaller departments with less media attention but equally abusive patterns?

It says: just wait it out.

BNCL’s Perspective

BNCL knows firsthand that institutional reform does not happen without pressure. We have spent decades suing cities that promised reform and then quietly went back to business as usual.

We don’t buy the idea that three or four years is enough to undo decades of systemic racism and violent culture. True reform takes time, transparency, and tenacity — none of which were respected in this decision.

This is not about justice. It’s about optics. And the message is clear: without national outrage, civil rights don’t matter.

Communities Left Behind

The communities in Louisville and Minneapolis were told that justice was coming. That the federal government would help clean houses. That they would be safer. Now, they’re being told: “You’re on your own.”

Many community leaders found out the oversight was ending through media reports. No input. No warning. No transition plans.

This decision doesn’t just pull the rug out from under reform. It throws the whole damn rug into a fire.

What Comes Next

Civil rights groups across the country are rallying. Local organizations in both cities are planning protests, and several legal advocacy groups are exploring lawsuits to challenge the DOJ’s decision or at least demand transparency.

BNCL is calling for:

  • Immediate public release of DOJ assessments justifying the termination
  • Congressional hearings to investigate political influence over DOJ civil rights decisions
  • State-level legislation to enforce independent oversight, regardless of federal inaction

What You Can Do

  • If you live in Louisville or Minneapolis, attend city council meetings, demand transparency, and support local reform groups.
  • If you’re elsewhere, use your voice. This decision is a national warning sign.
  • Contact your congressional representatives and urge them to reinstate federal civil rights funding for oversight and reform programs.

Final Thoughts

Accountability isn’t a trend. It’s a necessity. The DOJ may have walked away, but BNCL and other civil rights advocates are not going anywhere. We will continue fighting — in courtrooms, in communities, and in the public square — until every police department is truly serving and protecting.

Case Results

Reginald Oliver v. City of Oakland

Oakland Police keep fabricating evidence and lying about minorities to arrest and prosecute them for supposed “gang” crimes, in violation of a settlement that prohibits …

Read More
Named plaintiff Reginald Oliver claims the Oakland PD continues violating the Constitution, in defiance of the settlement in Delphine Allen e al. v. City of Oakland, USDC No. C-00-4599 TEH, also known as "The Riders" litigation. Read Full Course
John Burris
Jane Smith v. City of Oakland

Racial profiling of Asian women by police officer resulting in a class action complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief

Read More
Finding evidence about defendant's post-conviction parole violation unfairly prejudicial "since the jury could have construed that parole violation as character evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)" Read Full Course
Rodney King
Rodney King v. City of Los Angeles

Rodney King has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have Judge John G. Davies disqualified from presiding at the trial of …

Read More
Rodney King waited too long to file a malpractice suit against the first of 27 lawyers who represented him in connection with the infamous beating he suffered from Los Angeles police in 1991, this district’s Court of Appeal ruled yesterday. The ruling by Div. Two affirmed Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann Kough’s grant of summary judgment to Steven Lerman. King earlier this year dismissed his appeal of Kough’s ruling in favor of two other lawyers sued in the case, Federico Sayre and John Burris. Read Full Course
FEATURED News & Updates

Civil rights lawyer John Burris confronts police narratives

Written by Janie Har, AP researcher Rhonda Shafner also contributed to this report. To read on AP News click here OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Before …

Watch our video
Share via
Copy link