BNCL Law Firm - Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry & Lacy

Can You Be Fired for Social Media Posts?

March 13, 2025

Can Your Employer Fire You for What You Post on Social Media? Understanding Your Rights

 

In today’s digital age, social media serves as a platform for personal expression, professional networking, and public discourse. However, it’s crucial to understand that your online activity can have repercussions in the workplace. Many employees operate under the misconception that the First Amendment’s protection of free speech extends to all forms of expression, including social media posts. In reality, the First Amendment safeguards individuals from government censorship but does not shield employees from consequences imposed by private employers regarding their social media activity.​

 

The First Amendment and Private Employment

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from restricting free speech. However, this protection does not extend to private employers. In most states, employment is “at-will,” meaning employers can terminate employees for any lawful reason, including social media activity that violates company policies or harms the company’s reputation. This means that while you have the right to express yourself online, your employer also has the right to enforce policies that may limit certain types of expression, especially if it affects the workplace environment or the company’s public image.​

 

Case Studies and Legal Precedents

Several legal cases have highlighted the complexities surrounding social media use and employment:​

  • Case Example 1: An employee was terminated after posting derogatory comments about their employer on a personal blog. The court upheld the termination, stating that the employee violated the company’s code of conduct.​

 

  • Case Example 2: A teacher was fired for posting photos on Facebook that the school deemed inappropriate. The court ruled in favor of the school, emphasizing the potential impact on the school’s reputation and the teacher’s role as a public figure.​

 

Protecting Yourself

To mitigate the risk of employment issues related to social media use, consider the following steps:

  • Review Company Policies: Familiarize yourself with your employer’s social media guidelines. Understanding these policies can help you navigate what is acceptable and what might be considered a violation.​
  • Adjust Privacy Settings: While privacy settings can limit the audience of your posts, they do not guarantee complete privacy. Be mindful that content shared online can still be disseminated beyond your intended audience.​
  • Think Before Posting: Consider the potential impact of your posts on your professional life. Avoid sharing content that could be deemed offensive, controversial, or detrimental to your employer’s reputation.​
  • Seek Clarification: If unsure about the appropriateness of certain content, consult your human resources department or refer to your company’s employee handbook for guidance.​

 

BNCL’s Role

At BNCL, we understand the complexities surrounding employment and social media. If you feel you’ve been unjustly treated or terminated due to your online activity, our employment discrimination attorneys are here to evaluate your case and advocate for your rights. We are committed to ensuring that employees are treated fairly and that their rights are protected in the evolving digital landscape.

Case Results

Reginald Oliver v. City of Oakland

Oakland Police keep fabricating evidence and lying about minorities to arrest and prosecute them for supposed “gang” crimes, in violation of a settlement that prohibits …

Read More
Named plaintiff Reginald Oliver claims the Oakland PD continues violating the Constitution, in defiance of the settlement in Delphine Allen e al. v. City of Oakland, USDC No. C-00-4599 TEH, also known as "The Riders" litigation. Read Full Course
John Burris
Jane Smith v. City of Oakland

Racial profiling of Asian women by police officer resulting in a class action complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief

Read More
Finding evidence about defendant's post-conviction parole violation unfairly prejudicial "since the jury could have construed that parole violation as character evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)" Read Full Course
Rodney King
Rodney King v. City of Los Angeles

Rodney King has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have Judge John G. Davies disqualified from presiding at the trial of …

Read More
Rodney King waited too long to file a malpractice suit against the first of 27 lawyers who represented him in connection with the infamous beating he suffered from Los Angeles police in 1991, this district’s Court of Appeal ruled yesterday. The ruling by Div. Two affirmed Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann Kough’s grant of summary judgment to Steven Lerman. King earlier this year dismissed his appeal of Kough’s ruling in favor of two other lawyers sued in the case, Federico Sayre and John Burris. Read Full Course
FEATURED News & Updates

Civil rights lawyer John Burris confronts police narratives

Written by Janie Har, AP researcher Rhonda Shafner also contributed to this report. To read on AP News click here OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Before …

Watch our video
Share via
Copy link