California Resisting Arrest / Assaulting An Officer Lawyers Placeholder canvas

Resisting Arrest / Assaulting An Officer

Arrested on Trumped-Up Charges?

Police are uncomfortable with citizens who assert their rights. When a suspect is uncooperative, dismissive or verbally indignant, some officers take it personally. They may break out the Taser or the handcuffs. They may call for back-up. They may convince witnesses to leave the area. And those officers always hope that the suspect will escalate the confrontation.

People who have committed no crime suddenly find themselves facing bogus criminal charges. In the African-American, Latino and Asian communities, citizens are all too familiar with “Contempt of Cop” charges. Civil rights lawyer John Burris has a successful record of standing up to this outrageous and unconstitutional behavior.

Alt Text!
The Law Offices of John L. Burris provides representation in both criminal defense and civil rights litigation. Based in Oakland, we take cases in the San Francisco Bay Area, Sacramento and surrounding counties of Northern California.

Here’s a scenario that plays out again and again: Police pull over a person on a lame excuse, hoping to find probable cause after the fact to search the suspect and the car for drugs or illegal weapons. No evidence is discovered, because the citizen has committed no crime. So the officers provoke the person by patting the person down and making threats or accusations. Sometimes it works, resulting in a physical altercation or loud and dramatic confrontation, and the patrolman can put the person in cuffs for resisting arrest, assaulting an officer or disturbing the peace. If they don’t get the desired reaction, officers may file charges anyway. Particularly if the person has a criminal record, who is the judge or jury going to believe?

Police have a good reason to file “cover charges.” If there is no arrest for an underlying crime, they realize they run the risk of a racial profiling or police misconduct complaint. They also know that a conviction for resisting arrest or assaulting police prevents a suspect from filing a civil rights lawsuit.

John Burris has handled police misconduct cases for over 25 years. He works to uncover the cover-up, addressing the trumped-up criminal charges and exploring possible litigation against the department. Contact our Oakland office now to discuss resisting arrest or a similar cover charge.

How can we help?

    Subject*

    Please describe your issue

    Our Offices

    Northern California Office Airport Corporate Centre
    7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
    Oakland, CA 94621
    Ph: (510) 839-5200
    Southern California Office
    9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000
    Beverly Hills, CA 90212
    Ph: (310) 601-7070
    For press inquiries,
    please contact:
    Lee Houskeeper
    newsservice@aol.com
    Ph: (415)654-9141

    Our Offices

    Northern California Office Airport Corporate Centre
    7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
    Oakland, CA 94621
    Ph: (510) 839-5200
    Southern California Office
    9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000
    Beverly Hills, CA 90212
    Ph: (310) 601-7070
    For press inquiries,
    please contact:
    Lee Houskeeper
    newsservice@aol.com
    Ph: (415)654-9141
    Case Results

    Reginald Oliver v. City of Oakland

    Oakland Police keep fabricating evidence and lying about minorities to arrest and prosecute them for supposed “gang” crimes, in violation of a settlement that prohibits …

    Read More
    Named plaintiff Reginald Oliver claims the Oakland PD continues violating the Constitution, in defiance of the settlement in Delphine Allen e al. v. City of Oakland, USDC No. C-00-4599 TEH, also known as "The Riders" litigation. Read Full Course
    John Burris
    Jane Smith v. City of Oakland

    Racial profiling of Asian women by police officer resulting in a class action complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief

    Read More
    Finding evidence about defendant's post-conviction parole violation unfairly prejudicial "since the jury could have construed that parole violation as character evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)" Read Full Course
    Rodney King
    Rodney King v. City of Los Angeles

    Rodney King has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to have Judge John G. Davies disqualified from presiding at the trial of …

    Read More
    Rodney King waited too long to file a malpractice suit against the first of 27 lawyers who represented him in connection with the infamous beating he suffered from Los Angeles police in 1991, this district’s Court of Appeal ruled yesterday. The ruling by Div. Two affirmed Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann Kough’s grant of summary judgment to Steven Lerman. King earlier this year dismissed his appeal of Kough’s ruling in favor of two other lawyers sued in the case, Federico Sayre and John Burris. Read Full Course
    FEATURED News & Updates

    Civil rights lawyer John Burris confronts police narratives

    Written by Janie Har, AP researcher Rhonda Shafner also contributed to this report. To read on AP News click here OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Before …

    Watch our video